
My Two-Cent Opinion On Politics In America
The Democrat Party moves further to the left, yet the die hard conservative Democrats (what I label the old Scoop Jackson types, where my family came from) keep voting for them - even though they don't realize what their party stands for anymore and that the extreme Left has commandeered their party. Many of these conservative Democrats don't realize that in this last election they helped install the most liberal left-wing Congress in U.S. history. Just look at their poll numbers - they're worse than Bush's. Remember when they ran on "we will bring down gas prices?" And, what happened? They went up! What amazes me is that the minorities (election, after election) keep voting for these socialists on the left and have forgotten that it was the Democrats, NOT the Republicans, that voted against the Civil Rights Act in the late 60s.
The Republican Party has lost it's conservative Reagan back bone and message (less government spending and smaller government in particular) and is moving left. Several are jumping ship and have lost their back bone on this War on Terror, and the war in Iraq. Illegal immigration, and lax border controls, are out of control and we have a President, and a Democrat Party majority, that want amnesty for illegal's, full Social Security benefits (for them and their extended family members), and a Guest Worker program that just begs for corruption.
Europe took a socialist approach and moved to the left at the end of WWII. This has, over the past 60+ years, resulted in; an industrial productivity drop due to shortened work weeks and 5-6 weeks of vacation/quality time, a near bankrupt budget due to the high cost of a dysfunctional nationalized healthcare system, and increased labor strife because of a need to import a lot of their labor force (mainly Muslims) due to a low birth rate aided by a high abortion rate. Ironically, they have learned that socialism is not working and they are now slowly moving to the right (but, with a lot of resistance from the government dependent gimme-gimee-gimee socialist types). You would think that we would learn a lesson from them, but no....we are doing the opposite and are moving to the left! Thanks to the left-wing hippies from the 1960s era now running the government and Wall Street. They want to take our freedom, nationalize industries, and head us down a road of serfdom and put an end to our free market system. What they don't realize is that they'll end up with a country run by a select elite, like the old Polit Bureau of the old Soviet Union. If they succeed, welcome to the new Socialist Republic of America.
In short, many of these politicians, on both sides of the isle, are self-serving and have sold out their country for nothing more than political power. Many are corrupt, and addicted to pork barrel spending.
The so-called independents/moderates, are in my opinion, nothing more than fence sitters, who have no core values or principles. They just wet their fingers, stick them up in the air, and go in the direction the wind is blowing.
The mainstream media is agenda driven (they still can't get over that damn 2000 election) and biased left, and operate under the caveat "tell a lie long enough and they will believe it." In addition, the media, and orgs like moveon.org (who is spending $175M to try and buy an election), are operating a covert war against Christianity. I'm not a real religious person, but it is becoming ever more clear to me that the main goal of of the liberal left in this country, especially the Hollywood elite, is to ban God from everything.
Bob Parks expresses my sentiments exactly in this short movie. Viewer caution is requested, as the movie message may be hard for some to swallow - abet, the truth. Another great article about the future of this country and the world, which echoes many of the points in the book "America Alone - By Mark Steyn."

'My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world.
I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it.'
-- Barack Hussein Obama
''Life's tough.....it's even tougher if you're stupid.''
-- John Wayne
Webmaster |
Are The Rich Paying Their Fair Share Of Taxes?

Barrack Obama states that he wants to raise the taxes on anyone making $150,000 (top 5% earners) and above, and lower the taxes on anyone making below this. To the individual who makes less than $150,000 a year, this sounds fair. Never mind that this $150,000/YR (5%) group consists of many small business owners that already pay 60% of all income taxes and 162% of their fair share. The LESS THAN $150,000/YR group (95% of taxpayers) that Obama wants to give a tax-cut to, currently earn 63% of all income, and pay 40% of all taxes, which is a fair share of taxes paid of only 63%! This group does NOT need a tax cut, they don't pay their fair share now! Is this fair to the group currently paying 162% of their fair share? In other words, it means cash payments to the 40% or so of households who don't pay income taxes! This is nothing but a socialistic distribution of wealth ploy! Remember, Bill Clinton ran on this same promise (a middle-class tax cut), but never followed through when elected - neither will Obama.
To increase taxes during a period of sluggish economy (or recession) would be a very bad move. These earners, and small business owners, do not put their money under their mattresses, or stash it in accounts offshore. They invest it in their own businesses, and provide the majority of the capital investment in this country. You take away this business expansion and capital investment sources, and you're going to see higher unemployment, less business expansion, fewer new companies, and a deep recession, if not a depression. As JFK, Reagan, and Bush have learned, decreasing taxes puts more money in the Treasury coffers than increasing taxes. In fact, when President Bush lowered taxes, it resulted in an increase of 20% more tax money in the treasury coffers than occurred during the Clinton Administration. Increasing taxes, decreases capital investment and the incentive to work harder (or expand one's business) and reduces the overall amount of taxes paid into the Treasury coffers.
Add Obama's intention to raise Corporate Taxes (we already have the second highest corporate tax rate in the world), raise the *Capital Gains tax (from 15% to 28%), and removing the cap on the amount of income that is subject to Social Security taxes, and all economic expansion in this country will come to a screeching halt! You think the economy is sluggish now! Just wait.
In one of the Democrat debates, ABC news anchor Charlie Gibson asked Obama "don't you realize that increasing the Capital Gains tax would result in less tax money collected and would be bad for the economy?" Obama's answer was "well, it's a matter of fairness." This man is willing to destroy the economy for what he perceives as a matter of fairness??!! If this one statement does not point to this man's total lack of inexperience and lack of any economic policy knowledge, nothing does. Amazing!
Also, keep in mind that the increase in jobs that Obama claims will happen under his presidency, will be primarily government jobs (created by all of his social programs, and so-called green jobs). These type of jobs add nothing to the GDNP and create no wealth. Their wages are paid by us, the taxpayers.
On the Fanny Mae/Freddy Mac/AIG bailout: The Democrats would like you to believe that the credit/mortgage crisis is not their fault, and are attempting to shift the blame to the economic policies of the Bush Administration {which is not lily white either]. Of course, they're counting on the fact that the majority of the public get all of their news from the liberal left-wing media and will not take the time, or have the intelligence to do any actual research on the subject. If you do research the subject, you will find that these lax mortgage/credit rules started under the Carter Administration, and were dramatically expanded under the Clinton Administration - this was done to get more minorities and poor people into their own home. In 2003, the Bush Administration became increasingly concerned about what was happening with Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac, and wanted to place caps on them. The Republicans initiated legislation to tighten up the rules and place caps, and it was blocked by the Democrats (thanks to the 60 vote needed to pass requirement initiated by Harry Reid). On twenty different occasions the Republican Congressmen and Senators have tried to insert this legislation, only to have it blocked each time by Harry Reid, Chris Dodd, or Barney Frank. Their reason was "it would prevent the poor from owning a home." Now, we have many of these lower income people sitting in homes that they can't afford [they should never have been able to purchase them in the first place]. Some didn't even have to explain what they did for a living, and many were illegal aliens! Two of the biggest crooks (Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson), who were CEO's of Fanny Mae, became rich [walked away with over $125 million between them] by cooking the books and running Fanny Mae into the ground. Now these two are advisors to Barrack Obama!!! Also, the number one recipient of campaign donations from Fanny Mae and Freddy Mac is Chris Dodd, and the number two recipient is Barack Obama!!! Barney Frank received more than $40,000 in campaign donations from Fannie since 1989, and was once romantically involved with a Fannie Mae executive! Tell me crime does not pay!!!
This bailout is nothing but financial socialism designed to bailout the fat cats on Wall Street and a bunch of foreign banks. It is nothing more than the nationalization of the credit markets. Many of these Wall Street fat cats are Democrats. Don't believe me? Check it out. I personally believe in the free market system, and believe these companies should be allowed to fail. They would then, like most failed companies, be forced to renegotiate with creditors, and have to reassess the value of their assets. As for the people occupying these homes, if they can't pay the mortgage, they have no right to be in the home! These type of buyers were essentially allowed to finance 120% of the loan amount (home price plus creative financing to get the required 20% down), and did not have the income, or assets, to pay the monthly mortgage payment in the first place. You say I have no sympathy for these poor home owners? Well, like my old pappy used to say "I'll tell you where you can find SYMPATHY in the dictionary....it's between SHIT and SYPHILIS." Furthermore, many of these homeowners are walking away from their homes because they owe more than it's worth, NOT because they can't afford the monthly payment! You don't see that fact represented in the foreclosure statistics!
Add this $700B (probably closer to $1 Trillion) to the $53 Trillion (yes, that is TRILLION!) un funded obligations to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid over the next ten years and you're looking at a drastically reduced standard of living in this country. Wake up America!
Okay, I'm done venting. |







If you get an e-mail with "Nude Photos of Sarah Palin" in the subject line, do not open it. It might contain a virus.
If you get an e-mail with "Nude Photos of Hillary Clinton", do not open it. It might contain nude photos of Hillary Clinton.

Hillary Clinton said that her childhood dream was to be an Olympic athlete. But she was not athletic enough. She said she wanted to be an astronaut, but at the time they didn't take women. She said she wanted to go into medicine, but hospitals made her woozy. Should she be telling people this story? I mean she's basically saying she wants to be president because she can't do anything else.' --Jay Leno
'Well, the big story -- Hillary Clinton will be running for president in 2008. You know why I think she's running? I think she finally wants to see what it's like to sleep in the president's bed.' --Jay Leno
'Top Democrats have mixed feelings about Sen. Hillary Clinton running for president. Apparently, some Democrats don't like the idea, while others hate it.' --Conan O'Brien
'In a fiery speech this weekend, Hillary Clinton wondered why President Bush can't find the tallest man in Afghanistan. Probably for the same reason she couldn't find the fattest intern under the desk.' --Jay Leno
'Former President Bill Clinton said that if his wife, Hillary, is elected president, he will do whatever she wants. You know Bill Clinton -- when he makes a vow to Hillary, you can take that to the bank.' --Jay Leno
'Did you know Bill and Hillary Clinton were born under the same sign? Know what sign? 'For Sale.'' -Jay Leno
'A student from the University of Washington has sold his soul on eBay for $400. He's a law student, so he probably doesn't need it, but still, that's not very much. Today, Hillary Clinton said, 'Hey, at least I got some furniture and a Senate seat for mine.' -Jay Leno
'Hillary Clinton said today that she wants legislation to allow all ex-felons to vote. See, this way all the Clinton's former business partners can vote for her in 2008.' --Jay Leno

A man walked into a very high-Tec bar. As he sat down on a stool he
noticed that the bartender was a robot. The robot clicked to
attention and asked, "Sir, what will you have?"
The man thought a moment then replied? "A martini, please". The
robot clicked a couple of times and mixed the best martini the man had
ever had.
The robot then asked, "Sir, what is your IQ?"
The man answered "oh, about 164."
The robot then proceeded to discuss
the 'theory of relativity' 'inter-stellar space travel', 'the latest medical
breakthroughs', etc...
The man was most impressed. He left the bar but thought he would
try a different tack. He returned and took a seat. Again the robot
clicked and asked what he would have.
"A Martini, please?" Again it was superb. The robot again asked "What is your IQ sir?"
This time the man answered, "Oh, about 100". So the robot started
discussing NASCAR racing, the latest basketball scores, and what to
expect the Dodgers to do this week end.
The guy had to try it one more time. So he left, returned and took
a stool.... Again, a martini, and the question, "What is your IQ?"
This time the man drawled out " Uh..... 'bout 50"..??
The robot clicked then leaned close and v-e-r-y slowly asked,
" A-r-e y-o-u-r p-e-o-p-l-e g-o-i-n-g t-o n-o-m-i-n-a-t-e H-i-l-l-a-r-y-?
|


Be Prepared For The Next Two Years

They're Going To be A pain In The Ass!

Before the election, which saw the party of John Murtha and Nancy Pelosi return to power, Jihad Jaara, a senior member of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades and the man who led the terrorist group's 2002 seizure of Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity, expressed this wish: "Americans should vote Democratic."
Al Qaida thanks you! |

Tax Cuts - As Explained By A Democrat
If you don't understand the Democrats' version of tax cuts (and you
are not alone), maybe this will help explain it:
50,000 people go to a baseball game, but the game was rained out. A refund was then due.
The team was about to mail refunds when the Congressional Democrats stopped them and suggested that they send out refund amounts based on the Democrat National Committee's interpretation of fairness.
After all, if the refunds were made based on the price each person
paid for the tickets, most of the money would go to the ticket
holders of the most expensive tickets. That would be unfair and
unconscionable.
People in the $10 seats will get back $15, because they have less
money to spend. Call it an "Earned Income Ticket Credit." Persons "earn" it by demonstrating little ambition, few skills and poor work
habits, thus keeping them at entry-level wages.
People in the $25 seats will get back $25, because that's only fair.
-
People in the $50 seats will get back $1, because they already make a
lot of money and don't need a refund. After all, if they can afford a
$50 ticket, then they must not be paying enough taxes.
People in the $75 luxury seats will have to pay another $50, because
they have way too much to spend.
The people driving (or walking) by the stadium who couldn't afford to
watch the game will get $10 each, even though they didn't pay
anything in, because they need the most help (sometimes known as
Affirmative Action!).
Now do you understand?
If not, contact Representative Nancy Pelosi, Senator Ted Kennedy or
Senator Hillary Clinton for assistance.
|







Actually this isn't very funny, kinda scary when you think about it....


Lifted from grouchyoldcripple.com
Can a good Muslim be a good American?
I sent that question to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years.
The following is his reply:
Theologically - no. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon god of Arabia.
Religiously - no. Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Koran, 2:256)
Sculpturally - no. Because his allegiance is to the five pillars of Islam and the Quran (Koran).
Geographically - no. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
Socially - no. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.
Politically - no. Because he must submit to the mullah (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and Destruction of America, the great Satan.
Domestically - no. Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34).
Intellectually - no. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
Philosophically - no. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.
Spiritually - no. Because when we declare "one nation under God," the Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran's 99 excellent names.
Therefore after much study and deliberation.... perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. They obviously cannot be both "good" Muslims and good Americans.
Call it what you wish.... it's still the truth.

Peaceful Muslims??!!


After seeing this, whatever sympathy I had for their
cause just evaporated out my steaming head!

"In the first
place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good
faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be
treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage
to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace,
or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every
facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided
allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something
else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag,
the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that
is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty
and that is a loyalty to the American people."
Theodore Roosevelt 1907

How did this loony toons Congresswoman get elected?
For 6 terms no less!!

21 Beliefs of a Democrat
1. You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.
2. You have to believe that businesses create oppression and governments create
prosperity.
3. You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans
are more of a threat than U.S. nuclear weapons technology in the hands
of Chinese and North Korean communists.
4. You have to believe that there was no art before Federal funding.
5. You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by
cyclical documented changes in the earth's climate and more affected
by soccer moms driving SUV's.
6. You have to believe that gender roles are artificial but being homosexual
is natural.
7. You have to believe that the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of federal funding.
8. You have to believe that the same teacher who can't teach 4th-graders
how to read is somehow qualified to teach those same kids about sex.
9. You have to believe that outdoors men don't care about nature, but
loony activists who have never been outside of San Francisco do.
10. You have to believe that self-esteem is more important than actually doing
something to earn it.
11. You have to believe that Mel Gibson spent $25 million of his own
money to
make The Passion of the Christ for financial gain only.
12. You have to believe the NRA is bad because it supports certain parts
of the constitution, while the ACLU is good because it supports certain
parts of the Constitution.
13. You have to believe that taxes are too low, but ATM fees are too high.
14. You have to believe that Margaret Sanger and Gloria Steinem are more important
to American history than Thomas Jefferson, Gen. Robert E. Lee, and Thomas
Edison.
15. You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial
quotas and set-asides are not.
16. You have to believe that Hillary Clinton is normal and is a very
nice person.
17. You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn't worked
anywhere it's been tried is because the right people haven't been in
charge.
18. You have to believe conservatives telling the truth belong in jail,
but a liar and a sex offender belonged in the White House.
19. You have to believe that homosexual parades displaying drag, transvestites,
and bestiality should be constitutionally protected, and manger scenes
at Christmas should be illegal.
20. You have to believe that illegal Democratic Party funding by the
Chinese Government is somehow in the best interest to the United States.
21. You have to believe that this message is a part of a vast, right
wing conspiracy.

DEMOCRATS
Who Received
Abramoff Money
Although
reporters continue to insist that the Abramoff imbroglio is "a
Republican scandal," 40
of the Democratic Party's 45 U.S. senators made the Jack Abramoff dishonor
roll, including:
Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) - $22,500
Senator Evan Bayh (D-IN) - $6,500
Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE) - $1,250
Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) - $2,000
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) - $20,250
Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) - $21,765
Senator Tom Carper (D-DE) - $7,500
Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY) - $12,950
Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND) - $8,000
Senator Jon Corzine (D-NJ) - $7,500
Senator Chris Dodd (D-CT) - $14,792
Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND) - $79,300
Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) - $14,000
Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) - $2,000
Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) - $1,250
Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) - $45,750
Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI) - $9,000
Senator Jim Jeffords (I-VT) - $2,000
Senator Tim Johnson (D-SD) - $14,250
Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) - $3,300
Senator John Kerry (D-MA) - $98,550
Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) - $28,000
Senator Pat Leahy (D-VT) - $4,000
Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) - $6,000
Senator Joe Lieberman (D-CT) - $29,830
Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) - $14,891
Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) - $10,550
Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) - $78,991
Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) - $20,168
Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE) - $5,200
Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) - $7,500
Senator Mark Pryor (D-AR) - $2,300
Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) - $3,500
Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) - $68,941
Senator John Rockefeller (D-WV) - $4,000
Senator Ken Salazar (D-CO) - $4,500
Senator Paul Sarbanes (D-MD) - $4,300
Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) - $29,550
Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) - $6,250
Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) - $6,250 |



Muslim Outrage

This link sums up the Muslim Outrage
about the best I've seen,
Click
Here
[To View]
Lifted from Grouchy
Old Cripple, and he stole it from Boortz.
Muslim outrage huh. OK ... let's do a little historical review.
Just some low lights:
-
Muslims fly commercial airliners into buildings
in New York City. No Muslim outrage.
-
Muslim officials block the exit where school
girls are trying to escape a burning building because their
faces were exposed. No Muslim outrage.
-
Muslims cut off the heads of three teenaged
girls on their way to school in Indonesia. A Christian school.
No Muslim outrage.
-
Muslims murder teachers trying to teach Muslim
children in Iraq. No Muslim outrage.
-
Muslims murder over 80 tourists with car bombs
outside cafes and hotels in Egypt. No Muslim outrage.
-
A Muslim attacks a missionary children's school
in India. Kills six. No Muslim outrage.
-
Muslims slaughter hundreds of children and
teachers in Beslan, Russia. Muslims shoot children in the back.
No Muslim outrage.
-
Let's go way back. Muslims kidnap and kill
athletes at the Munich Summer Olympics. No Muslim outrage.
-
Muslims fire rocket-propelled grenades into
schools full of children in Israel. No Muslim outrage.
-
Muslims murder more than 50 commuters in attacks
on London subways and busses. Over 700 are injured. No Muslim
outrage.
-
Muslims massacre dozens of innocents at a
Passover Seder. No Muslim outrage.
-
Muslims murder innocent vacationers in Bali.
No Muslim outrage.
-
Muslim newspapers publish anti-Semitic cartoons.
No Muslim outrage
-
Muslims are involved, on one side or the other,
in almost every one of the 125+ shooting wars around the world.
No Muslim outrage.
-
Muslims beat the charred bodies of Western
civilians with their shoes, then hang them from a bridge. No
Muslim outrage.
-
Newspapers in Denmark and Norway publish cartoons
depicting Mohammed. Muslims are outraged.
Dead children. Dead tourists. Dead
teachers. Dead doctors and nurses. Death, destruction and mayhem
around the world at the hands of Muslims .. no Muslim outrage
... but publish a cartoon depicting Mohammed with a bomb in his
turban and all hell breaks loose.
Come on, is this really about cartoons?
They're rampaging and burning flags. They're looking for Europeans
to kidnap. They're threatening innkeepers and generally raising
holy Muslim hell not because of any outrage over a cartoon. They're
outraged because it is part of the Islamic jihadist culture to
be outraged. You don't really need a reason. You just need an
excuse. Wandering around, destroying property, murdering children,
firing guns into the air and feigning outrage over the slightest
perceived insult is to a jihadist what tailgating is to a Steeler's
fan.
I know and
understand that these bloodthirsty murderers do not represent
the majority of the world's Muslims. When, though, do they
become outraged? When do they take to the streets to express
their outrage at the radicals who are making their religion
the object of worldwide hatred and ridicule? Islamic writer
Salman Rushdie wrote of these silent Muslims in a New York
Times article three years ago. "As their
ancient, deeply civilized culture of love, art and philosophical
reflection is hijacked by paranoiacs, racists, liars, male supremacists,
tyrants, fanatics and violence junkies, why are they not screaming?"
Indeed. Why not? |



Can't Blame White People
by Bill Cosby
They're standing on the corner
and they can't speak English.
I can't even talk
the way these people talk:
Why you ain't,
Where you is,
What he drive,
Where he stay,
Where he work,
Who you be...
And I blamed the
kid until I heard the mother talk.
And then I heard
the father talk.
Everybody knows it's
important to speak English...except these knuckleheads.
You can't be a doctor
with that kind of crap coming out of your mouth. In
fact you will never get any kind of job making a decent living.
People marched and
were hit in the face with rocks to get an education,
and now we've got these knuckleheads walking around.
The lower economic
people are not holding up their end in this deal.
These people are
not parenting.
They are buying things
for kids. $500 sneakers for what?
And they won't spend
$200 for Hooked on Phonics.
I am talking about
these people who cry... when their son is standing
there in an orange suit.
Where were you when
he was 2?
Where were you when
he was 12?
Where were you when
he was 18? And, how come you
didn't know that he had a pistol?
And where is the
father?
Or who is his father?
People putting their
clothes on backward:
Isn't that a sign
of something gone wrong?
People with their
hats on backward, pants down around the crack, isn't
that a sign of something?
Or are you waiting
for Jesus to pull his pants up?
Isn't it a sign of
something when she has her dress all the way up and
got all type of needles piercing] going through her body?
What part of Africa
did this come from? We are not Africans.
Those people are
not Africans; they don't know a thing about Africa.
With names like Shaniqua,
Taliqua and Mohammed and all of that crap, and all of
them are in jail.
Brown or black versus
the Board of Education is no longer the white
person's problem.
We have got to take
the neighborhood back.
People used to be
ashamed.
Today a woman has
eight children with eight different 'husbands' -- or men
or whatever you call them now.
We have millionaire
football players who cannot read.
We have million-dollar
basketball players who can't write two paragraphs.
We as black folks
have to do a better job.
Someone working at
Wal-Mart with seven kids saying... you are hurting us.
We have to start
holding each other to a higher standard.
We cannot blame the
white people any longer
It is not for media or
anyone of this time anymore to say whether I'm right or wrong.
It is time, ladies and gentlemen, to look at the numbers.
Fifty percent of
our children are dropping out of high school. Sixty percent
of the incarcerated males happen to be illiterate. There's
a correlation.
Tell the media to stop asking
me what I think about people who don't believe what I'm
saying or feel that I'm too harsh or feel that I'm just running
my mouth because I'm old. Seventy percent of the teenagers pregnant
happen to be African American girls. Don't ask me to soften
my message."
Bill Cosby
Bill Cosby: Poor
blacks cant speak English
NAACP leaders stunned
by remarks of prominent comedian.
Before you send me an email calling
me a racist....think about it - WebMaster


Steve Forbes Praises 'Do As I Say' Book
Former presidential
candidate Steve Forbes has high praise for Peter Schweizer's
new book about liberal hypocrisy, calling it "a
book that'll make your eyes pop."
Forbes, editor-in-chief
of Forbes magazine, writes in his Fact and Comment column
about "Do As I Say (Not As I Do): Profiles in
Liberal Hypocrisy," saying that "the mainstream media love
it when notable conservatives get caught not practicing what
they preach concerning public behavior."
But "as this book engagingly documents," liberals "are
in many respects even bigger hypocrites than are fallen conservatives."
Forbes cites several examples of blatant liberal hypocrisy exposed
by Schweizer, a fellow at the Hoover Institution, including:
- Filmmaker Michael Moore claims
he doesn't invest in the stock market. In fact, his foundation has
bought shares in scores of companies, including Halliburton,
which he routinely castigates.
- House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi champions organized
labor. But Pelosi and her husband own a vineyard that employs
only nonunion workers. And she owns part of a California
resort that is also nonunion.
- Comedian Al Franken often charges
that Republicans are racists, yet his staff is actually
whiter than Bob Jones University, a school that Franken
labels "racist."
- "Environmentalist" Ted Kennedy opposed a "clean energy" wind-power
system off Cape Cod - because it was close to his family
compound in Hyannis, Mass.
"On and on it goes," Forbes writes. "Strangely
(not!), Schweizer's revelations have received scant coverage
in most of the media."





The
New DNC Theme Song

[Click
On The Button]

THE
TRUTH ABOUT TED KENNEDY
A letter
from Mary Jo Kopechne
I would
have been 65 years of age this year. Read about me and my
killer below.
When
Sen. Ted Kennedy was merely just another Democrat bloating on Capitol
Hill on behalf of liberal causes, it was perhaps excusable to ignore
his deplorable past. But now that he's become a leading Republican
attack dog, positioning himself as Washington's leading arbiter
of truth and integrity, the days for such indulgence are now over.
It's time for the GOP to stand up and remind America why this chief spokesman
had to abandon his own presidential bid in 1980 -It is time to say the
words Mary
Jo Kopechne out loud.
As
is often the case, Republicans have deluded themselves into thinking
that most Americans already know the story of how this "Conscience
of the Democratic Party" left
Miss Kopechne behind to die in the waters underneath the Edgartown Bridge
in July 1969, after a night of drinking and partying with the young blonde
campaign worker. But most Americans under 40 have never
heard that story, or details of how Kennedy swam to safety, then tried
to get his cousin Joe Garghan to say he was behind the wheel.
Those young voters don't know how Miss Kopechne, trapped inside Kennedy's
Oldsmobile, gasped for air until she finally died, while the Democrats' leading
Iraq war critic rushed back to his compound to formulate the best alibi he
could think of.
Neither does
Generation X know how Kennedy was thrown out of Harvard on his
ear 15 years earlier -- for paying a fellow student to take his
Spanish final. Or why the US Army
denied him a commission because he
cheated on tests.
As
they listen to the Democrats' "Liberal
Lion" accuse President Bush of "telling
lie after lie after lie" to get America to go to war in Iraq. Young
voters don't know about that notorious 1991 Easter weekend in Palm Beach,
when Uncle Teddy rounded up his nephews for a night on the town, an evening
that ended with one of them credibly accused of rape.

Republicans vs. Democrats
A young woman was about to finish her first year of college. Like so
many others her age, she considered herself to be a very liberal Democrat,
very much in favor of the redistribution of wealth.
She was deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch Republican,
a feeling she openly expressed. Based on the lectures that she had participated
in, and the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that her father
had for years harbored an evil, selfish desire to keep what he thought
should be his.
One day she was challenging her father on his opposition to higher taxes
on the rich and the addition of more government welfare programs. The
self-professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors had to be the
truth and she indicated so to her father.
He responded by asking her how she was doing in school.
Taken back, she answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, and
let him know that it was tough to maintain, insisting that she was taking
a very difficult course load and was constantly studying, which left
her no time to go out and party like other people she knew. She didn't
even have time for a boyfriend, and didn't really have many college friends
because she spent all her time studying.
Her father listened and then asked, "How
is your friend Aubrey doing?"
She replied, "Aubrey is barely getting
by. All she takes are easy classes, she never studies, and she
barely has a 2.0 GPA. She is so popular on campus; college for
her is a blast. She's always invited to all the parties, and lots
of times she doesn't even show up for classes because she's too
hung over."
Her wise father asked his daughter, "Why
don't you go to the Dean's office and ask him to deduct a 1 .0
off your 4.0 GPA and give it to your friend who only has a 2.0.
That way you will both have a 3.0 GPA and certainly that would
be a fair and equal distribution of GPA."
The daughter, visibly shocked by her father's
suggestion, angrily fired back, “That wouldn't be fair!” I
have worked really hard for my grades! I've invested a lot of time,
and a lot of hard work! Aubrey has done next to nothing toward
her degree. She played while I worked my tail off!"
The father slowly smiled, winked and said
gently, "Welcome
to the Republican Party"
Forever
Green
Jane
Fonda seeks exoneration,
Forgiveness from her traitored nation.
What say you warriors fought that war?
Is forgiveness due that wartime whore?
So rich, so smart, she thought she knew
Much more than us, we bloodied few.
So smug, self-serving, seeking fame,
The rich bitch played her seditious game.
A
game that cost me many friends,
Many, thanks to Jane, came to bad ends.
I’ve borne scars forty years or more,
From lies laid on me by this whore.
Self-serving now she sells her tale,
This traitor who should be in jail.
Is it within our souls to grant her grace?
Our souls shout, “No… spit in her face!”
So
self assured, she played high stakes,
Telling American prisoners, “That’s the breaks.”
She accused brave men of heinous crimes,
Which were disproved in future times.
And now our country knows the truth
Jane Fonda betrayed us in our youth.
She asks us now to read her book,
Americans, the folks this bitch forsook.
So
now she crawls, her conscience bare,
To tell us she screwed up back there.
Well, hell, we knew that way back then,
This Hanoi Jane who helped them win.
It was glory then for this airhead star,
But forever now she’ll bear the scar
A scarlet letter she’ll now wear,
A stench forever in her hair.
So
Jane, dear, you must realize,
You’re the devil in a helmet in our eyes.
When Vietnam vets raise up their toasts
It’s to damn your soul, to salute our ghosts.
We swear, we living, to our long-dead brave,
We’ll live to piss upon your grave.
So Jane, good fortune, unforeseen,
Your traitor’s grave will be forever green.
Russ
Vaughn
2d Bn, 327th Parachute Infantry Regiment
101st Airborne Division
Vietnam 65-66
|

Why are
today's Democrats so ferociously set against fixing the system?
It's not just that the Bush-bashers couldn't stand to see Bush get
credit for it. They know how to climb aboard the front of a victory
train and pretend they've been leading it all along. No, the problem
is that individual ownership of retirement accounts would lead to
a fundamental change in society. We would become an ownership society,
no longer dependent on government largesse. Our retirement money
would not be available for Congress to spend on its favorite pork
projects. Worst of all, from their viewpoint, we no longer would
have to be grateful to our elected representatives!
SOCIAL
SECURITY FACTS
Franklin
Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program.
He promised:
1.)
That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary,
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first
$1,400 of their annual incomes into the Program,
3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program
would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent "Trust
Fund" rather than into the General operating fund and therefore,
would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program
and no other Government program and,
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed
as income.
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving
a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we
are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government
to "put away," you may be interested in the following:
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent "Trust" fund
and put it into the General fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the Democratically-controlled
House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for
Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A:
The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore
casting the "tie-breaking" deciding vote as President
of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the U.S.
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments
to immigrants?
A: Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.
Immigrants moved into this country and at age 65, began to receive
SSI Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments
to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!
Then, after doing all this thieving and violation
of the original contract (FICA), the Democrats
turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your
Social Security away and the worst part about it is uninformed citizens
believe it!
Some
Food For Thought
By
Russ Vaughn
2d Bn, 327th Parachute Infantry Regiment
101st
Airborne Division
Vietnam 65-55
I
am so sick of the liberal left, both domestic and foreign,
constantly berating America as being morally bankrupt and
a plague upon mankind. To them, we are quite singularly responsible
for all the evil in the world through our crass, greedy,
capitalistic practices. So, tonight, this unapologetic capitalist
is watching Oliver North’s War Stories and I’m
seeing American sailors who survived the sinking of their
ship and were imprisoned by the Japanese. A photo reveals
their starkly emaciated condition upon their post-war emancipation,
graphic evidence of the cruel deprivation inflicted upon
them by the Japanese. A now robust surviving sailor tells
Ollie he came out of that camp weighing 95 pounds.
I
think about that for a moment and a kaleidoscope of such images
that I have witnessed in my sixty-three years lights up my
mind: innumerable accounts of the gross mistreatment of prisoners
from many sources; the bone-visible survivors of Auschwitz
and other German concentration camps; the human skeletons emerging
from the Philippine hellholes the Japanese maintained; the
skeletal denizens of the Soviet gulag, starved and worked to
death for transgressions against the regime; American POW’s,
repatriated from North Korea and Vietnam. And, more recently,
I recall the videos of bloated bellied African toddlers, starved
by an uncaring, despotic government in Sudan.
But
you know one image that isn’t there? I delve deep into
my mind trying to find even one example and I cannot find it.
Can you guess what it is? Try this: go back through all your
experiences of the twentieth century and try to come up with
one, just one, just one single image of a starving, emaciated
prisoner in the custody of American troops or the American
government. I’m not saying it may not exist, but if it
did, don’t you think some self-loathing, America-hating
college professor would have revealed it to the world by now?
Yes, mistreatment occurred on both sides during our civil war,
but by the time I grew up, literally in middle America, in
a small town in Oklahoma, attitudes had changed; the German
POW’s incarcerated in our local prison were well treated,
well fed, and encouraged to be healthy contributors to our
economy. They did.
And
that folks, says a hell of a lot about us, about you, about
me, and about this great country, which together, we comprise.
Yeah, we may take some terror suspects into custody and interrogate
them aggressively. We may imprison Taliban suspects in Guantanamo
and deprive them of sleep and discomfit them in other ways
in our efforts to glean battlefield intelligence from them.
We may even have committed the horrible transgression of putting
panties (gasp) over some terrorists’ heads in Abu Ghraib.
But guess what? None of them, not one single prisoner whom
I’ve seen in the mainstream media’s avalanche of
news reports of our horrible transgressions, exhibits any evidence
of being starved.
Nope
they all look amazingly well fed, don’t they? There wasn’t
one single scarecrow in that pornographic pyramid of prisoners
in Abu Ghraib. Nope, all those butts looked amazingly rotund
and well fed, didn’t they? Admittedly, they’re
kinda skinny by American standards, but there’s not one
human skeleton in the lot as far as I’ve been able to
determine, not a single starvation induced, skin-stretching
rib or jauntily jutting hipbone in evidence in any one of those
pictures.
So
what does that say, America, about our moral bankruptcy, our
inhumanity and our lack of concern for our fellow man? Well,
it tells this ol’ Texas boy that all those pointy-headed
academics, like that phony, overweight, cigar-store Indian,
Ward Churchill, and all his loudly complaining, liberal supporters,
don’t have one single clue about the real evils that
exist in this world. From their ivory castles, they hurl barbed
charges against us, you and me, us ol’ ordinary folks,
proclaiming us the spawn of the Devil because we support that
other devil, Karl Rove, who is out to put them all in chains.
They are clueless, totally clueless; and they damned sure don’t
have a clue about the good fortune that has been visited upon
them by their birthright to be citizens of this great nation,
a nation that, in spite of all its faults, does not starve
its prisoners.
There
is no greater cruelty in life than that of depriving a living
creature of food to the point of starvation.
Just
think about that all you pet-owning, America-hating Liberals
and then consider your political friends.



Read my short story to determine
which you may be.
[Click
On Button To View]
Liberals
Are Socialists
By
Nathan Tabor
What
do you think you’ll get if you go to Google and search:
“what is liberalism?”
Here
are two definitions of “liberalism” that I
found on the Princeton website:
1.
a political orientation that favors progress and reform;
2.
an economic theory advocating free competition and a self-regulating
market.
Wow!
Both of those definitions sound downright Conservative
to me. But let’s think about these interesting ideas
in modern terms for a moment.
Regarding
Definition Number One, the new-styled Liberals in the Democrat
Party of today only want to “reform” things that
give people more from the government and require less personal
responsibility. Their idea of “progress” is a new
government bureaucracy to tell people how to think and live.
As
to Definition Number Two, the Liberals of today are the
complete opposite of the free-market model. Their core
agenda is to tax people and businesses to pay for their
social programs. Consider all the nanny alphabet agencies
like OSHA, EPA, EEOC, etc. — not very much self-regulating
there!
Now
let’s consider the definition of “Socialism.”
This is what you get if you go to Google and search “what
is socialism?”:
1.
a theory or system of social organization by which the major
means of production and distribution are owned, managed, and
controlled by the government, by an association or workers,
or the community as a whole. (Does this one sound like a Hillary
Clinton speech, or what?);
2.
an economic system in which the means of production are controlled
by the state.
We
wonder why the Chinese are taking over the production of most
consumer goods sold in the U.S.A. The answer is simple. They
use convict labor and pay slave wages. Meanwhile, back in the
states, the Democrats have pushed for all these government programs,
regulations and taxes that restrict the ability of our own domestic
companies to compete on the global market.
Classical
Liberalism is about freedom, and government leaving people alone.
Socialism
is about total control, and government being involved in everything.
We
ought to give hungry people a fishing pole and teach them how
to fish; instead, we give them hot fried fish in a convenient
to-go box at a drive-thru window.
It’s
time to rename the party of Howard Dean, Hillary Clinton,
Ted Kennedy, Michael Moore and all the rest. If it looks
like a duck, quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck
. . . then it must be a duck.
Today’s
Liberals are really Socialists. If the Democrats ever wish
to reach the common man, they are going to have to be honest
with their agenda.
About
the Writer: Nathan Tabor
is a conservative political activist
based in Kernersville, North Carolia, where he owns a successful
small business, and was a recent candidate for Congress.




More Humor & Politics Sections
[Click On Banners]
If
you're a left-wing Bush Hating Liberal
OR
one
of those so-called Moderates, who in my opinion,
have no core principals (they just sway in the wind)
OR
just
plain don't like my opinion,
Click
Here

|

|